¿Cómo implicar a los estudiantes para que utilicen el feedback online?

  1. Anna Espasa-Roca 1
  2. Teresa Guasch-Pascual 1
  1. 1 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
    info
    Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01f5wp925

    Geographic location of the organization Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Journal:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 24

Issue: 2

Pages: 127-148

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.24.2.29107 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Despite a firm commitment to the implementation of continuous and formative assessment in Higher Education, in practice, this type of assessment is still not a reality. In this assessment framework, feedback processes take on a key relevance as learning facilitators. However, recent research on feedback concludes that students do not use it and they do not engage with it. The aim of this study is to provide evidence on how the strategy based upon the resubmission of an assignment can promote students’ engagement with feedback in online or hybrid environments. To achieve this aim, a quasi-experiment with pre-post measurements was designed. The sample consisted of 76 students who received the intervention (resubmission of the assignment after receiving feedback) and 60 students in the control group. Results show that resubmission is associated with higher levels of engagement with feedback. The discussion highlights the relevance of the results in online contexts or with intensive use of technology, and the potential to transfer them to educational practice. This, in turn, has an impact on the regulation and design of actual effective training practices that can eventually contribute to learning

Bibliographic References

  • Ajjawi, R., y Boud. D. (2015). Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
  • Black, P., y Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. 10.1080/0969595980050102.
  • Boud, D., y Molloy, E. (2013.) Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  • Boud, D. (2020). Challenges in reforming higher education assessment: a perspective from afar. RELIEVE, 26(1), art. M3. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088
  • Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., y Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407 https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
  • Carless, D. (2018). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
  • Carless, D., y Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
  • Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., Mayordomo, R. M., y Naranjo, M. (2008). La evaluación continuada como instrumento para el ajuste de la ayuda pedagógica y la enseñanza de competencias de autorregulación. Cuadernos de Docencia Universitaria núm. 8. ICE de la Universitat de Barcelona. Editorial Octaedro. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/144979
  • Espasa, A., Guasch, T., Mayordomo, R. M., Martínez-Melo, M., y Carless, D. (2018). A Dialogic Feedback Index measuring key aspects of feedback processes in online learning environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1430125
  • Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
  • Fernández-García, P., Vallejo-Seco, G., Livacic-Rojas, P. E., y Tuero-Herrero, E. (2014). Validez estructurada para una investigación cuasi-experimental de calidad. Se cumplen 50 años de la presentación en sociedad de los diseños cuasi-experimentales. Anales de Psicología, 30(2). 756-772. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.166911
  • Fisher, R., Cavanagh, J., y Bowles, A. (2011). Assisting transition to university: using assessment as a formative learning tool. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903308241
  • Fontes de Gracia, S., García-Gallego, C., y Quintanilla, L. (2015). Fundamentos de investigación en psicología. UNED - Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., y Paris, A. C. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1): 59-109 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., y Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
  • García Aretio, L. (2021). COVID-19 y educación a distancia digital: preconfinamiento, confinamiento y posconfinamiento. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 09-32. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080
  • Gibbs, G., y Simpson, C. (2009). Condiciones para una evaluación continuada favorecedora del aprendizaje. Cuadernos de Docencia Universitaria num 13. ICE de la Universitat de Barcelona. Editorial Octaedro. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/144983
  • Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., y Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
  • Guasch, T., y Espasa, A. (2015). Collaborative Writing Online: Unravelling the Feedback Process. En M. Deane y T. Guasch (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Writing Online: Strategies for success (pp. 13–30). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290846_003
  • Guasch, T., Espasa, A., y Martinez-Melo, M. (2019). The art of questioning in online learning environments: the potentialities of feedback in writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1479373
  • Guasch, T., y Espasa, A. (2020). Menos es más: menos correcciones y más feedback para aprender. En A. Sangrà (Coord.), Decálogo para la mejora de la docencia online. Propuestas para educar en contextos presenciales discontinuos (pp. 151-167). Editorial UOC. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/122307/1/9788491807766_no_venal.pdf
  • Kirschner, P. A., y Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens. Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061523
  • López, V. M. (2006). El papel de la evaluación formativa en el proceso de convergencia hacia el EEES. Análisis del estado de la cuestión y presentación de un sistema de intervención. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20(3), 93-119.
  • O’Donovan, B., Rust, Ch., y Price, M. (2015). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 938-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774
  • Pintrich, P. R., y De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1). 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Price, M., Handley, K., y Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
  • San Martín, S., Jiménez, N., y Jerónimo, E. (2016). La evaluación del alumnado universitario en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Aula Abierta, 44, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2015.03.003
  • Steen-Utheima, A., y Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
  • UNESCO (2020). COVID-19 y educación superior: De los efectos inmediatos al día después. Análisis de impactos, respuestas políticas y recomendaciones. http://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COVID-19-ES-130520.pdf
  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., y Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
  • Winstone, N., y Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in Higher Education. A learning focused approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
Data source: Dialnet